For law firms, regulatory specialists, and advisory practices
Structured, source-graded regulatory intelligence across payments, cryptoassets, data protection, financial crime, gambling and AI rules in 170 jurisdictions, with the primary statutory instrument one click away on every claim. Qualified local counsel, specialist compliance practices, and sector advisory firms review and sign off structured jurisdiction records in their home market.
1Live Expert Contributors & signed jurisdiction records
Our contributor network spans law firms, regulatory compliance consultancies, and sector advisory practices. Rather than commissioning marketing articles, we publish a structured statutory baseline first and invite qualified local practitioners to challenge, correct, and sign off the jurisdiction record for their home market — with named individual and firm/practice attribution on the published dossier.
Cross-portfolio contributor coverage (live from D1):
On Advennt (Gambling), 21 jurisdiction records are published with named contributor sign-off across 14 contributor firms and specialist advisories (30 practices engaged across 50 jurisdictions, with 28 in active review) — including both law firms and specialist compliance and gaming advisories (such as KMC Consultancy and Entergaming Advisors Limited).
On World Payments, Cryptoassets, Data Protection, and Sentinel (Financial Integrity), 3 core reference jurisdictions (United Kingdom, Gibraltar, and European Economic Area) are published with expert review by Ramparts†.
Each reviewer approved the text of their jurisdiction against a hash of what they saw, within the scope stated on the page.
Most recent
Where an answer actually changed
Answer-last-changed dates, not collection dates — we re-check more often than the answer changes. 0 of 170 records carry no answer-change date yet; they are not counted as unchanged.
4 NovUnited Arab Emirates— 6 open · 5 restricted · 4 closed · 4 uncertain · 1 not yet assessedexpert-reviewed
4 NovBrazil— 5 open · 1 restricted · 2 closed · 5 uncertain · 7 not yet assessedexpert-reviewed
4 NovAlgeria— 1 open · 18 closed · 1 uncertainAI-assembled
4 NovGibraltar— 18 open · 2 uncertainexpert-reviewed
4 NovLatin America— 4 open · 2 restricted · 1 closed · 13 not yet assessedAI-assembled
†Related-party disclosure: Ramparts (Ramparts Corporate Services Limited / Ramparts Law) shares common directors and shareholders with Asymmetric Intelligence Limited. Every Ramparts-reviewed record carries this disclosure inline alongside its primary statutory citations.
2One live record with an open evidence drawer
Every published finding is tied to a specific statutory instrument, regulator guidance document, or enforcement action. Switch domain below (or share ?domain=crypto|payments|dp|fi|gambling|ai) to inspect a real published claim and its open evidence drawer.
🇬🇧 United Kingdom·01 Crypto Licensing (Open on Free Tier)
CLM-UK-LIC-01
Source: primary legislation (Tier 1)Confidence: ConfirmedStatus: In force (FSMA transition 25 Oct 2027)Expert-reviewed: Ramparts (24 Oct 2026)
“Cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers carrying on business in the United Kingdom must be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under Regulations 14A and 56–60 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/692), transitioning to full FSMA Part 4A authorisation under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Regulations 2025 (SI 2025/1120) on 25 October 2027.”
[CLM-UK-LIC-01 · Tier 1 Statute] Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/692), Reg 14A (cryptoasset exchange provider & custodian wallet provider definitions) and Regs 56–60 (FCA fit-and-proper registration gate); paired with SI 2025/1120 & FCA Final Crypto Roadmap Rules (published 30 June 2026, compulsory authorisation date 25 October 2027).
3Three ways to work with us
Whether you lead a specialist regulatory practice, run a compliance advisory team, or build internal legal AI tools, we work with partner firms in three clear ways.
1 · Expert Contributor Model
Review and be named
For qualified local counsel, regulatory specialists, and sector advisory practices reviewing structured jurisdiction dossiers in their home market.
Named individual & firm attribution (with practice logo, reviewer bio, and direct website link) at the top of every signed jurisdiction record
Zero pay-to-influence: contributors never pay to be listed, and we never share subscription or licensing revenue with reviewers
Structured annual review commitment: verify or challenge our cited statutory baseline once a year; post-review updates are badged Not reviewed until you sign them off
Complimentary Portfolio / Firm workspace access across our six regulatory monitors and the Signal workspace for your reviewing team
For law firms, financial institutions, and RegTech platforms ingesting structured regulatory intelligence into internal knowledge systems or client-facing products.
Scope 1 — Internal Systems & Internal RAG: load structured jurisdiction records, change webhooks, and claim lineage into internal compliance systems and firm-wide AI assistants
Scope 2 — External Product, OEM & AI Grounding: embed derived statuses, reports, or MCP / AI Grounding feeds inside client portals and commercial AI workflows
Every feed carries full statutory citations, confidence grades, and point-in-time version history
For multi-jurisdiction practices, industry associations, and advisory groups collaborating on cross-border regulatory briefings, client workshops, or benchmark coverage.
Client-advisory Firm workspaces (up to 8 named seats) with full client-delivery rights on generated reports and comparison matrices
Co-published cross-border briefings and jurisdiction launch roundtables anchored on open primary-source citations
Single-Monitor or Portfolio Subscriptions tailored to your practice group’s coverage footprint
Looking for individual Pro (1 seat) or multi-seat Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights) subscriptions? See the unified plan overview at a-i.gi/licensing/ →.
4What we are not
Not legal advice. Our monitors provide structured regulatory intelligence and decision support; they do not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.
Machine-assembled from cited primary sources unless badged expert-reviewed. Every record states plainly whether it is Machine-assembled from cited primary instruments or Expert-reviewed by a named contributor against a pinned snapshot hash.
Benchmark run by us and AI-judged. Our head-to-head topic benchmark and claim challenger are run by us using frontier LLM judges and are not yet independently validated (inspect full results, negative runs, and limits →).
United Arab Emirates
Malaysia
Germany
Greece
Tobique First Nation
United Kingdom
Gibraltar
Austria
Nigeria
Australia
Mexico
Serbia
Malta
Spain
South Africa
Estonia
Hong Kong
Brazil
Bulgaria
Ireland